Times Now asked one of our important poet, Meena Kandasamy, to comment on Anna Hazare and she said, “I don’t have the time to comment about comedy.” Bang on. But using the word farce would suit more than comedy, I thought.
What else can one comment when events well managed by PR agencies are portrayed by media as social movements? I guess to criticize this ‘movement’ we will have to put in more thoughts than what these people have put in- if any- for the ‘movement’.
First let us try and see the different threads that have got tangled here. Corruption, Lokpal bill, Mode of protest, Right to protest, Anna’s arrest- all these are different things and thanks to the national shame called media which has mixed all these things and are confusing the people to make them feel that the ‘second independence struggle’ is has grounded on the soil of this nation.
Well, when I have no solid proof to say that this ‘movement’ is being managed by a PR agency I must start off by explaining why I think it is so. When Anna went on fast in the month of April a friend, who works for a PR agency, told me that she overheard in her office that Anna’s movement had hired a PR agency for the ‘movement’. It was hard to believe but when Anna advertised for Pepsi-Nimbooz while breaking his fast it was clear that it was a PR tactics. Then his fast began soon after India’s world cup victory and now it was supposed to begin the day after Independence Day. Anna’s fasting, as a part of the movement, has to begin when the nation is charged up with patriotic feelings! Great plans seem to be working behind the fasts and ‘movement’. Dates are well planned. This too appears like a PR strategy to my eyes. More the reason to believe, for me, that there is a PR agency working behind the so called movement is the kind of media publicity this farce is getting. On 17 August I saw CNN-IBN taking Shabnam Hashmi’s byte and I felt that she was cut short early for she was critical about Anna and his ‘movement’. Though the anchor said, “Well it is always good to know the other side…” it appeared like she had instructions not to let sane voices speak for long. These media have made a hero out of Anna through sms, missed call and other similar modes. Though these could be viewed as new methods of protest in the new media era it is also a method which has stemmed out of lack of imagination and also a business plan and tie-up between the media and mobile networks. Such unimaginative methods, as opposed to the solidarity expressed by people earlier during other social movements, makes me believe that these sms and missed call also a PR strategy. How to forget the guest appearance of Anna in the TV programme Sa Re Ga Ma Pa? What could it be other than PR strategy? When Anna praised murderers like Narendra Modi after his April fast it was mainly viewed as his leaning towards Hindu fundamentalism. But all you know it might be a PR strategy, if the same agency which has been hired by Modi, to cleanse blood stains from his kurta, has been hired by the Anna team. <Well I know that here I am just trying to join the dots and I am ready to be criticized and pointed out as wrong if I am wrong>
Saying all these I must express my solidarity with Anna and his fellows at certain levels. We need to fight corruption. Yes, agree. We should have the right to protest. Yes, agree. It was wrong to arrest Anna. Yes, agree and condemn the arrest too. But do I support Anna’s movement? No.
The demand for an ombudsman who would be selected and not elected is highly undemocratic. Plus this undemocratically elected ombudsman should be, according to Anna and team, more powerful than the democratically elected ones (It is a totally different debate altogether as to how good or bad efficient or inefficient they are but what needs to be noted is that they are democratically elected) I wonder how such an ombudsman is acceptable to the larger mass of this nation! The people seem to be supporting this demand of Anna blindly failing to see its consequences while they are carried away by the anti-corruption wave which is the banner under which Anna is operating holding an undemocratic demand. The people are seeing only the banner and not the demand. Rather the cameras of the media are focusing only on the banner and not on the demand file that Anna is holding in his hand.
To know how unthinkingly people are marching under this banner one should listen to what a lady in Udupi said. This unknown lady from Nagarika Samithi was leading the students of MGM in the protest march and when asked for a byte from media she started off saying, “I support Annappa Swamy because…” She had not even got the name properly. At this point one can argue that though she did not know the name she felt for the cause and the fact that she thought about the issue and got down to the streets is a positive thing and Anna’s success lies in that. But to me the failure of Anna is in the same. If a movement cannot wake up people but manages to make them walk and run in their sleep, it is no movement to me and will not result in anything good.
The students of Sanskrit College in Udupi read some mantras in order to fight against corruption!!! Only farce can outsmart farce. If they knew the mantra already why on earth did they wait till the Anna show began? Do they really think corruption can be fought with some mantras? But this idea of being able to fight corruption through mantras is no different from what the larger mass believes that corruption can be actually fought with the mantra of lokpal bill.
The definition of corruption, as per the dictionary of Anna and team seem to be limited. Anna, I am told, is a core member of the Vande Matharam foundation which openly declares its anti-reservation stand which is quite castist in nature. Isn’t caste and caste oppression a form of corruption, in the broad sense and humane sense of it? The so called movement seems to have hired a PR agency for their so called movement. Isn’t PR a form of corruption? We have moved on to discuss cultural capital and not just capital and our idea of corruption should take into account cultural capital too, it appears to me. But the Anna team seems to ignore all these and demand for one undemocratic ombudsman.
Media has failed to focus on the bill drafted by Anna and team, discuss it and show its limitations and mistakes to the people. Instead it is making a hero out of Anna because the government gave them a chance to do so by exposing its ‘bankruptcy of political ideas’ while it should have had the moral to criticize the arrest of Anna but at once and at the same time critically discuss the Lokpal bill the poverty of imagination on the part of the so called movement, the leaning of the so called movement towards Hindu fundamentalism, the middle-class nature of the so called movement and debate them. But media has been mixed anti-corruption, lokpal, anna’s arrest and people agitation and has been creating confusion for the people and pushing people to more agitation in order to feed their 24×7 hunger for footage and news.
In this tangling of different threads it has become difficult to say where one stands. Is Medha Pathkar opposing the arrest of Anna or is she also for the Lokpal bill? Are the leftist parties voicing for the right to protest or are they in support of the bill and Anna’s ‘movement’ too? We have mixed things for ourselves too and that is exactly what is dangerous. We may want to fight corruption but standing under the same umbrella with Anna and team will make us strengthen the voice for the demand of an undemocratic ombudsman and also strengthen right wing politics.
We are living in difficult times where issues are so tangled that taking a stand is difficult and being indifferent, silent and apolitical is also difficult. We are living in weird times too where corporate powers run the government and PR agencies script not just media but also ‘movements’.
It was really ‘good’ to see a ‘well knitted’ article projecting the ‘other side view’ of Anna Hazare and his ‘PR Agency assisted Fight Against Corruption’. This has been my observation – people always put up such ‘other side views’, to be called as ‘intellectuals’, for example: write some ‘dirty hypothesis’ about Gandhi, he/she would get noticed and might be called an ‘intellectual’.
Well, my opinion – ‘we should not question the method or path chosen by somebody else, if we dont have a better one’.
I would be very happy to know if you have a better path / method to keep corruption under check.
ಶ್ರೀ ಅನಿಲ್ ಅವರಿಗೆ ,
” I would be very happy to know if you have a better path / method to keep corruption under check.” ಭಾರತೀಯ ಸಂವಿಧಾನದಲ್ಲಿರುವ ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರಕ್ದೆ ಸಂಬಂಧಿಸಿದ ನಿಯಮಗಳನ್ನು ನಿತ್ಯ ಜೀವನದ ವ್ಯವಹಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಕಟ್ಟುನಿಟ್ಟಾಗಿ ಅಧಿಕಾರದಲ್ಲಿರುವವರು ಆಚರಣೆಗೆ ತಂದರೆ ಸಾಕು , ಬಹುಪಾಲು ಭ್ರಷ್ಟಾಚಾರ ಹತೋಟಿಗೆ ಬರುತ್ತದೆ . ” ರಸ್ತೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ವಾಹನಗಳು ಎಡಗಡೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸಂಚರಿಸಬೇಕು ” ಎಂಬ ಒಂದು ಸಾರಿಗೆ ನಿಯಮದ ಪಾಲನೆ ಹೇಗೆ ನೂರಾರು ಅಪಘಾತಗಳನ್ನು ಹತೋಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿಟ್ಟಿದೆಯೋ , ಅಂತೆಯೇ ಈಗಿರುವ ಭ್ರಷ್ಟಾಚಾರ ನಿಗ್ರಹದ ನಿಯಮಗಳನ್ನು ಮೊದಲು ಆಚರಿಸತೊಡಗಿದರೆ , ಅಷ್ಟರಿಂದಲೇ ಎಷ್ಟೋ ಒಳ್ಲೆಯದಾಗುತ್ತದೆ .
Dear Nagaraj,
I completely agree with you on the fact that smaller initiatives by us like
– obeying traffic rules etc would do changes for us. I do not differ with that fact. But what I felt was ‘We need a bigger whip for a bigger beast’ and that ‘bigger whip’ is in the form of this country wide agitation.
Dear readers,
And I thought the article did not look at a bigger picture, in taking out the ‘essence’ of this awakening – mitigate the cases of corruption (I do not use the word ‘eradicate’ , but I hope that would happen in a longer run).
Even though Jan Lokpal is not the one point solution to deal with corruption, but we can not deny the fact that a strong lokapl would be one more tool to deal with the problem ( Just like the RTI for that case – which has set right many ‘would be scams’ )
ಸಂಪಾದಕರಲ್ಲಿ ಒಂದು ವಿನಂತಿ .
ಈ ಬರಹ ತುಂಬಾ ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿದೆ .ಜನಸಮುದಾಯ ಅತ್ಯಂತ ಸಂಕೀರ್ಣವಾದ ಸನ್ನಿಗೆ ಒಳಗಾದಂತಿರುವ ಸಂದರ್ಭದಲ್ಲಿ ಅಣ್ಣ ಹಜಾರೆಯವರ ಚಳುವಳಿಯ ಸಾಮಾಜಿಕ ವಾಸ್ತವದ ವಿಚಾರಗಳನ್ನು ಪ್ರಸ್ತಾಪಿಸಿರುವ ಈ ಬರಹದ ಕನ್ನಡ ಅನುವಾದವನ್ನು
” ಅವಧಿ ” ಯಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರಕಟಿಸಿದರೆ , ಓದುಗರು ಇನ್ನು ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿ ಚಳುವಳಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬೆಸೆದುಕೊಂಡಿರುವ ಒಳಗಂಟುಗಳನ್ನೆಲ್ಲಾ ಮನದಟ್ಟು ಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದು .
very well written article.. you have rightly brought out the confusion that lies in many peoples minds.. As rightly said people are just mesmerised.. it is a fact that everybody in the country are fed up with corruptionas they have to face this menace at several point of tiime in their lives. The success of Annas PR lies intheir timing and confusing the people in to mobilising their sentiments against corruption towards vested agendas.
ಅಣ್ಣಾ ಲೋಕ್ ಪಾಲ್ ಬಿಲ್ ಮೇಲೆ ಚರ್ಚೆಗಳು ಶುರುವಾಗಿದ್ದಾಗ ಗಮನಿಸಿದೆ ಎಲ್ಲೂ ಯಾವ ಮೀಡಿಯಾದಲ್ಲೂ ಈ ಲೋಕ್ ಪಾಲ್ ಬಿಲ್ ಏನು ಎಂಬುವುದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಸರಿಯಾದ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಕೋಟ್ಟಿಲ್ಲ.ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರ ತೊಲಗ್ ಬೇಕು ಎಂಬುವುದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಎಲ್ಲರಿಗೂ ಸಹಮತವಿದ್ದರೂ ಈ ಜನ್ ಲೋಕ್ ಪಾಲ್ ಬಿಲ್ಲ್ ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರವನ್ನು ನಿರ್ಮೂಲನೆಯಾಗುತ್ತಾ, ಅಥವಾ ಈ ಬಿಲ್ ಜಾರಿಗೆ ಬಂತು ಇನ್ನೇನಾದರೂ ಅನಾಹೂತ ಆಗುತ್ತಾ ಇದರಬಗ್ಗೆ ಎಲ್ಲೂ ಚರ್ಚೆಯಿಲ್ಲ. ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಕಡೆ ಇದು ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರದ ವಿರುದ್ಧದ ಹೋರಾಟ, ಅಣ್ಣಾವ್ರು ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರ ನಿರ್ಮೂಲನೆ ಮಾಡಲು ಹೋರಟ್ಟಿದ್ದಾರೆ,ಎಂಬ ಭಾವನೆಯನ್ನು ಮೀಡಿಯಾಗಳು ಮೂಡಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಇದರಿಂದ ಜನ ಅಣ್ಣಾ ಅವರಿಗೆ ಬೆಂಬಲಕೊಟ್ಟರೆ ಸಾಕು, ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರ ಮತ್ತು ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರಿಗಳು ದೇಶದಿಂದ ತೊಲಗುತ್ತದೆ ಎಂದು ಕನಸು ಕಾಣುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ.
ಇನ್ನೊಂದು ಗಮನಿಸಬೇಕಾದ ವಿಷಯ-ಎಲ್ಲಾ ದೇಶಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಒಂದೆಲ್ಲಾ ಒಂದು ರೀತಿಯ ಚಳುವಳಿಗಳು ನಡೆಯುತ್ತಾ ಇರುತ್ತದೆ. ಚಳುವಳಿಗಳು ಯಾವಾಗ ಜನರಲ್ಲಿ ಮತ್ತು ಸಮಾಜದಲ್ಲಿ ಅಸಮಾಧಾನ ಹೆಚ್ಚುತ್ತೋ , ಯಾವಾಗ ಸರ್ಕಾರ ಅಥವಾ ಆಡಳಿತದ ಮೇಲೆ ಜನರು ನಂಬಿಕೆ ಕಳೆದಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಾರೆ ಆವಾಗ ಹುಟ್ಚುತ್ತದೆ. ಇದು ಒಂದು cycle ಥರಾ. ಹೀಗೆ ಹುಟ್ಟುವ ಚಳುವಳಿಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಕೆಲವು ಭಾಗಿಕವಾಗಿ ಯಶಸ್ಸು ಕಂಡರೆ ಕೆಲವು ಹಲವು ಕಾರಣಗಳಿಂದ ಅದರ ಗುರಿಯನ್ನು ಮುಟ್ಟುವುದರಲ್ಲಿ ವಿಫಲವಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯವಾಗಿ ಇಂಥ ಒಂದು movement mugidu ಇನ್ನೊಂದು ಶುರುವಾಗುವುದರ ಮಧ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ gaps ಇರುತ್ತದೆ. ಈ ಗ್ಯಾಪ್ ನ್ನು ಕಂಫರ್ಟ್ ಪಿರೇಡ್ ಎಂದು ಕರೆಯಬಹುದು. ಈ ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಯಾವುದೇ ಚಳುವಳಿಗಳು ಇರುವುದಿಲ್ಲ ಅದರ ಅರ್ಥ ಸಮಾಜದಲ್ಲಿ ಅಸಮಾಧಾನ ಇರುವುದಿಲ್ಲಾ ಅಂತ ಅಲ್ಲ. ಇದು ಅಸಮಾಧಾನಗಳು crystalise ಆಗುವ ಸಮಯ. ಯಾವಾಗ ಜನರಿಗೆ ವ್ಯವಸ್ತಿತಿ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಇರುವ ಕೋಪ- ಆಕ್ರೋಶಗಳು ಮಿತಿಮೀರುತ್ತದೆ, ಆವಾಗ ಅವರ ಅಸಮಾಧಾನಗಳು mobilise ಆಗುತ್ತಾ ಚಳುವಳಿ ಪ್ರಾರಂಭವಾಗುತ್ತದೆ.ಈಗ ನಾವಿರುವುದು ಅಂತ ಒಂದು ಚಳುವಳಿಯ ಮಧ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ..ಜನರು ಸಮಾಜದ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಸ್ತರಗಳಿಗೂ ಹರಡಿರುವ ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಬೇಸತ್ತು ಒಂದು ರಕ್ಷಕ ಕಂ ಮಜೀಷ್ಯ ನನ್ನು ಹುಡುಕ್ಕುತ್ತಿದ್ದರು. ಅಣ್ಣಾ ಅವರು ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರ ನಿರ್ಮೂಲನೆಯನ್ನು ತಮ್ಮ ಗುರಿ ಎಂದು ಘೋಷಿಸಿದ್ದಾಗ, ಜನರೂ ಎರಡನೇ ಯೋಚನೆಯಿಲ್ಲದೇ ಅವರೇ ತಾವು ಎದುರು ನೋಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಮ್ಯಾಜಿಷ್ಯನ್ – ರಕ್ಷಕ ಎಂದು ಆಯ್ಕೆ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದಾರೆ.(ಅವರ ಪ್ರಾಯ, ಗಾಂಧಿಯನ್ ಫಿಲೋಸಫಿ ಅವರ ಆಯ್ಕೆಯನ್ನು ಸುಲಭವಾಗಿಸಿತ್ತು. )
ಹೀಗೆ ಹುಟ್ಟುವ movements ಗಳ ಯಶಸ್ಸು ಮತ್ತು ಸೋಲು, ಅದರ ಗುರಿ ಮತ್ತು ಆ ಗುರಿಗೆ ತಲುಪಲು ಅದರ ನಾಯಕರು ಆಯ್ಕೆ ಮಾಡಿರುವ ದಾರಿ/ ವಿಧಾನ ಮತ್ತು ಎಷ್ಚರ ಮಟ್ಟಕ್ಕೆ ರೂಟ್ ಲೆವಲ್ ಪಾರ್ಟಿಸಿಪೇಷನ್ -ಸಪ್ಪೋರ್ಟ್ ಇರುತ್ತದೆ ಅದರ ಮೇಲೆ ಬಹಳಷ್ಟು ನಿರ್ಭರವಾಗಿರುತ್ತದೆ. ಹಾಗೆ ನೋಡಿದ್ದರೇ ಅಣ್ಣಾ ಟೀಂನ ಗುರಿ ಸರಿಯಾಗಿದೆ, ಆದರೇ ಗುರಿ ತಲುಪಲು ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸಿರುವ ವಿಧಾನದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಗೊಂದಲವಿದೆ. ಅವರ ಬೆಂಬಲವನ್ನು ಎಷ್ಟು ರೂಟ್ ಲೆವಲ್ ಪಾರ್ಟಿಸಿಪೇಷನ್ ಸಿಗುತ್ತದೆ ಅದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಕುತೂಹಲವಿದೆ. ನನಗನಿಸುವುದು ಈಗ ಅವರನ್ನು ಬೆಂಬಲಿಸುತ್ತಿರುವವರು ಅವರಿಗೆ ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ಹೋರಾಟಕ್ಕೆ ಬೆಂಬಲ ನೀಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಹೊರತ್ತು ಲೋಕ್ ಪಾಲ್ ಬಿಲ್ ಗೆ per se ಅಲ್ಲ. ಯಾಕೆಂದರೆ ನಾನು ನೋಡಿದ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ಲೋಕ್ ಪಾಲ್ ಏನು ಎಂಬುವುದು ಹೆಚ್ಚು ಜನರಿಗೆ ಗೊತ್ತಿಲ್ಲ. ಈ ಹೋರಾಟದಲ್ಲಿ ಭಾಗವಹಿಸುತ್ತಿರುವರು ಹೆಚ್ಚು ಯುವಕರು.ಇವರ್ಯಾರು ಅವರ ಲೈಫ್ ಟೈಮ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ಚಳುವಳಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿದವರಲ್ಲ್, ಅಂದರೇ ಕಂಫರ್ಟ್ ಪಿರೇಡಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಬದುಕುತ್ತಿದ್ದವರು. ಆವರ ಮನಸ್ಸಲ್ಲಿ ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರ ವಿರುದ್ಥ ಇದ್ದ ಆಕ್ರೋಶವನ್ನು ವ್ಯಕ್ತಪಡಿಸಲು ಇದನ್ನು ವೇದಿಕೆ ಮಾಡಿಕ್ಕೊಂಡಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಹೊರತೂ ಅದರಿಂದಾಚೆಗೆ ಈ ಬಿಲ್ ನಿಂದ ನಿಜವಾಗಲೂ ಭ್ರಷ್ಠಾಚಾರ ಇಲ್ಲಾವಾಗುತ್ತಾ ಅಧವಾ ಅದಕ್ಕೆ ಆಲ್ಟರ್ನೇಟಿವ್ ಸ್ ಇದೆಯ ಎಂಬುವುದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಯಾರು ತಲೆ ಕೆಡಿಸಿಕ್ಕೊಂಡಿಲ್ಲ. ತಲೆ ಕೆಡಿಸಿಕ್ಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಅಣ್ಣಾಟೀಂನ ಪಿ ಆರ್ ಗಳಾಗಲಿ, ನಮ್ಮ ಕರಪ್ಟಡ್ ಮೀಡಿಯಾ ಆಗಲಿ ಧಾರಿ ತೋರಿಸಿಕೊಟ್ಟಿಲ್ಲ. ಎಲ್ಲದುಕ್ಕಿಂತ, ಇವತ್ತಿನ ಸಮಾಜಕ್ಕನುಸಾರವಾಗಿ ಸ್ಕ್ರಿಪ್ಟ್ ಆಗಿರುವ ಈ ಚಳುವಳಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಭಾಗವಹಿಸುವುದು ತುಂಬ ಕೂಲ್ ಮತ್ತು ಒಂದು ಬಟನ್ ಒತ್ತುವಷ್ಟು ಸುಲಭ…….
well every issue has two sides.We need some one to give a beginning for a cause. Annahazare has been a guding force to the masses on anticorruption movement. As rghtly pointed out so called intellectuals may talk loudly about the So called OTHER SIDE OF ANNA .. People know that this only to distract people. But this time people are notto be carried away by such tricks. This is because people are frustrated at all levels due deep rooted corruption in the system. coming to the path chosen by Anna ..what other alternative we the people in India have? polititians are capable of dragging on the matter affecting the public atlarge to eternity unless it is beneficial to them. Thus it is nececssary to force the issue to bring home the need. Jai ho Anna .. We are with you……. S.R.Venkatesh.
Anna is a autocrat. He is a threat to our democracy. So called middle class who are beneficiaries of the free market without understanding the essence of our democracy supporting him.
well! well! when anna starts his agitation everyone is there to throw abuses…if they have problem with his methods why dont they come out and do it their way…where were these people all these days and what were they doing..why are you hurling stones now and showing great sense that too from the comfort of your nest…come out and start a anti anna campaign in public and carry on public debate..let us see the public response…even if it is run by PR agency what is the problem with you…why dont you see the cause behind this campaign…long live critics!
EXCELENT SIR UNFORTUNATELY THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT REACH THE YOUTH WHO ARE PARTICIPATING IN THE JATRA ON THE OTHER HAND SOME PEOPLE MAY BRAND U AS AGAAINST THE MOVEMENT BUT THERE WAS ABSULUTE NECESSITY OF SOME MOVEMENT RISE OF VOICE AGAINST THE CORRUPTION AND PROBABLY AT RIGHT TIME ANNA HAS DONE IT BUT WILL LOKPAL BILL SOLVES THE TOTAL PROBLEMS OF COMMON MAN OF OUR COUNTRY A GUINUINE QUESTION UNFORTUNATELY THE INTELECTUAL CLASS OF THE CONTRY THEIR LAZYNESS SILENCE AT THIS TIME COST THE COMING GENERATION, I THINK WE HAVE NOT ONLY CORRUPTED PUR POLITICAL SYSTEM, OUR RELIGION,OUR EDUCATION,ALSO BEING CORRUPTED,ONLY WAY IS THIS MOVENT SHOULD BE TALEN IN THE BROADER ASPECT IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE LAST MAN OF THE LAND CAN ALSO GET TWO MEALS A DAY BUT WHO HAS TO DO IT BEKKIGE GANTE KATTUVAVARY YARU BUDDIJEEVIGALU BRASTARAGIDDARE,ILLAVE NISHKRIYARU SHANDARU AGIDDARE ADUILLACADALLI MATTINALOKADALLI DESHADA AGUHOGUGALANNU CHARCHISI CHARCHISI CHE EGAGABARADITTU,EEGADRE MUNDE HEGE ENNUTTALE NIDDE HOGUTTIDDARE NANAGE NAMMA DESHAKKONDU UTTAMA BHAVISHYAVIDE ENNUVA NAMBIKEYANTU ILLA, KADU NODABEKASTE.TELUGU KAVI SRISRI HELUVAHAGE EVARO VASTRANI EDO CHESTARANI EDURU CHUSI MOSAPOKUMA NIJAMU MARECHI NIDRAPOKUMA NAVELLA ECHETTU KOLLABEKAGIDE,MATTONDU SAMAGRA HORATAKKE KRANTIGE SIDDARAGABEKIDE. D,RAVI VARMA HOSPET
guys leave all, anna is against corruption , thats enough , we don’t know what is media, movement ……. as a aam admi we are fed up with corruption and we follow anna thats it nothing more nothing less , let us go with him or this corruption will eat entire forth comng geneation …. think , act now nor never
Anna is silent rowdy